HAMPSHIRE HAWKS V SURREY BROWN CAPS
at the Rose Bowl (Pro 40 League 2), 23 AUGUST 2006
Since Hampshire and Surrey have made useful starts to their respective Pro40
campaigns, this is a must-win contest for both sides. Given what happened the
last time they met, at Whitgift in this season's C&G Trophy, the visitors
will be mightily relieved that Shane Warne is on the other side of the world,
taking part in a bonding exercise with his Australia team-mates. That said, with
today's announcement that Anil Kumble is returning home to India, due to a
shoulder injury, there is no real advantage for either side in terms of overseas
personnel.
The dangers as far as the Brown Caps are concerned are the Hawks' top order
of Michael Carberry (450 runs at an average of 40.90 in List A cricket this
summer), John Crawley, Sean Ervine and Dominic Thornely. Polish them off quickly
and Surrey will really fancy their chances. At the Rose Bowl of course, the
chances of seeing a clatter of wickets are greater than at most headquarters
grounds. But then there is still Dimitri Mascarenhas, who has been a tough
customer with bat and ball over the years. Though, having said that, I see his
List A batting average against Surrey is a paltry 6.77.
Even without Warne, Hampshire have a highly effective and efficient-looking
attack. Billy Taylor and James Bruce head things up with the new ball, but the
key to tonight's contest is arguably Shaun Udal, who has picked up 14 wickets at
an average of 26.64 in List A cricket this summer with his light off-spin; and
who boasts an economy rate of just 4.19 runs per over.
Alistair Brown will be making his 350th appearance in List A cricket. Rikki
Clarke, if fit, will be making his 100th; as will Hampshire's Sean Ervine.
Rikki Clarke and Mark Ramprakash return to the fray after missing the
championship contest against Essex at Colchester, but Anil Kumble has drawn a
line under his time at Surrey and James Benning is said to be two more weeks
away from recovering from a broken finger. Curiously, the official club website
chooses not to mention the status of Jimmy Ormond, who, last we heard, had an
injured bicep and had been assigned his own personal fitness guru.
OPPONENT |
DATE |
COMP |
RESULT |
VENUE |
SURREY |
OPPONENT |
Leicestershire |
6 Aug 2006 |
NL |
Won By 33 Runs |
The Oval |
275-7 (40) |
242 (36) |
Derbyshire |
30 Jul 2006 |
NL |
Won By 8 Wickets |
Chesterfield |
211-2 (27.2) |
207 (39.4) |
Kent |
23 Jul 2006 |
NL |
Won By 6 Wickets |
Guildford |
232-4 (37) |
229-9 (40) |
Essex |
25 Jun 2006 |
C&G |
Lost By 6 Wickets |
Chelmsford |
128 (39) |
131-4 (15.3) |
Gloucestershire |
18 Jun 2006 |
C&G |
Lost By 2 Runs |
Bristol |
337 (49.5) |
339-8 (50) |
Wait for the toss. Whoever wins it will bat first and take the two points.
M Carberry, J Crawley, S Ervine, D Thornely, A Mascarenhas, G Lamb, C Benham, S
Udal (capt), N Pothas (wk), J Bruce and B Taylor.
Trevor Jesty and Peter Willey. (3rd umpire - Richard Illingworth).
DATE |
COMP |
RESULT |
VENUE |
TOSS |
DECISION |
SURREY |
HAMPSHIRE |
6
Jul 2006 |
T20 |
Won By 10 Runs |
Rose Bowl |
Surrey |
Bat |
141-5 (20) |
131 (19.1) |
4
Jun 2006 |
C&G |
Lost By 8 Wickets |
Whitgift School |
Hampshire |
Field |
166 (40.2) |
167-2 (26) |
15
Jul 2005 |
C&G |
Lost By 2 Wickets |
The Oval |
Surrey |
Bat |
358-6 (50) |
359-8 (47.5) |
25
Jun 2005 |
T20 |
Lost By 3 Wickets |
The Oval |
Surrey |
Bat |
118 (15.3) |
119-7 (17.5) |
9
Aug 2004 |
NL |
No Result |
Rose Bowl |
No toss made |
- |
- |
- |
3
Jul 2004 |
T20 |
Won By 31 Runs |
The Oval |
Surrey |
Bat |
198-5 (20) |
167-9 (20) |
3
May 2004 |
NL |
No Result |
The Oval |
No toss made |
- |
- |
- |
24
Jun 2003 |
T20 |
Won By 19 Runs |
Rose Bowl |
Surrey |
Bat |
140-9 (20) |
121 (20) |
21 Aug 2002 |
NL |
Won By 70 Runs |
The Oval |
Surrey |
Bat |
262 (44.5) |
192 (41.3) |
16 Jun 2002 |
NL |
Won By 3 Wickets |
Rose Bowl |
Surrey |
Field |
180-7 (44.1) |
178-8 (45) |
1 May 2002 |
B&H |
Lost By 1 Run |
The Oval |
Surrey |
Field |
242-7 (50) |
243 (50) |
4
May 2001 |
B&H |
Won By 23 Runs |
Rose Bowl |
Hampshire |
Field |
194 (50) |
171-9 (50) |
27
Jun 2000 |
NL |
Won By 43 Runs |
Southampton |
Surrey |
Bat |
116 (38) |
73 (32.4) |
30
May 2000 |
NL |
Won By 7 Wickets |
The Oval |
Hampshire |
Bat |
95-3 (21.1) |
94 (30.2) |
24
Apr 2000 |
B&H |
Lost By 2 Runs |
The Oval |
Surrey |
Field |
85-5 (10) |
87-7 (10) |
GO TO:
BACK TO:
|