SURREY V MIDDLESEX at the Brit Oval (FCC1), 21-24 SEPTEMBER 2005

If they are to hold on to their top flight status in the County Championship, Surrey must beat the side they have not managed to turn over since July 1998; as well as score one more bonus point in the process. Since '98 these two local adversaries have fought out five draws in six contests, and with the weather forecast appearing to be less than reliable for the first three days, the clever money must be on yet another impasse being reached. In short it isn't looking good, folks.

As I write my last game preview of the 2005 campaign, it seems almost hard to believe that back in April the odds-setters were saying that Surrey would be one of the contenders in this year's competition. Indeed, I even tipped them to win it, which has turned out to be the kiss of death in recent times. Next year, merely out of spite, I might just plumb for Kent! And, so, let's look on the bright side - if Surrey do go down at least it means we won't have to spend four days at C*nterbury in 2006.

For all of Surrey's deficiencies with the ball this term, at least they haven't drafted in a cast of has-beens to augment their attack in the way Middlesex have, firstly by giving Peter Trego another chance in county cricket, then doing likewise for ex-Derbyshire quick Mohammad Ali. To be fair, though, Alan Richardson (57 championship wickets at 24.17 runs apiece) has been a revelation since joining the North London outfit from Warwickshire; and Yogesh Golwalker has the credentials to suggest it may not be in Surrey's interests to produce a pitch that takes spin.

Middlesex's main strength lies in their batting. Owais Shah (1,578 runs at an average of 65.75) and Ed Joyce have both looked impressive this summer and, though I hate to agree with John Emburey, I think the England selectors have shown just how out of touch they are in preferring Paul Collingwood and Alex Loudon to Shah in terms of the party to tour Pakistan. Let's hope that the stylish 26-year-old doesn't feel the need to prove a point in this match, otherwise there will be no way of stopping Middlesex from scoring maximum bonus points.

With rumours abound that Surrey are set to name Steve Rixon's successor in the morning, one can only hope that 21 September 2005 will be regarded as the dawning of a new era in SE11. Unlike Rixon, little will be expected of the new man with Surrey in Div Two and armed with a squad that is some way off from being rebuilt or reunited.


Surrey v Middlesex seems to equal draw these days. Much as I would love to think that an alternative outcome beckons, my head tells me that we're probably in store for another stodgy contest. God, don't I sound like doom and gloom. Quick, where's that Morrissey CD again?


No real surprises. Bicknell and Ormond were known to be absentees some way out and even though Graham Thorpe is available for selection he is said to have not picked up a bat since the championship clash with Gloucestershire a month ago. The only issue appears to be which two out of Akram, Dernbach and Doshi will make the hosts' starting eleven.


E Smith, B Hutton (capt), O Shah, S Styris, E Joyce, P Weekes, B Scott (wk), P Trego, Y Golwalkar, A Richardson and Mohammad Ali.

DATE RESULT VENUE TOSS DECISION SURREY MIDDLESEX
8-11 Jun 2005 Match Drawn Lord's Middlesex Bat 460 437 & 353-6d
19-22 May 2004 Match Drawn The Oval Surrey Bat 359 & 300-4d 487-9d
21-24 Apr 2004 Lost By 6 Wickets Lord's Middlesex Field 418 & 203 325 & 300-4
23-26 Jul 2003 Match Drawn Guildford Middlesex Field 411 & 94-0 385
27-30 Jun 2003 Match Drawn Lord's Middlesex Bat 568 370 & 218-2d
9-12 Sep 1999 Match Drawn Lord's Surrey Bat 585 284 & 499-5
15-17 Jul 1998 Won By 280 Runs Guildford Surrey Bat 150 & 420 115 & 175
15-17 Aug 1997 Won By An Innings & 125 Runs Lord's Middlesex Bat 531-9d 205 & 201
4-8 Jul 1996 Won By 7 Wickets The Oval Middlesex Bat 366 & 61-3 232 & 194
29 Jun - 3 Jul 1995 Lost By An Innings & 76 Runs Lord's Middlesex Bat 209 & 140 425
25-29 Aug 1994 Lost By 2 Wickets The Oval Middlesex Field 425 & 313-3d 350-5d & 392-8
24-28 Jun 1993 Lost By 4 Wickets Lord's Surrey Bat 322 & 225 330 & 219-6
12-15 Sep 1992 Match Drawn The Oval Middlesex Bat 141-3d & 325-9 441 & 32-0d
23-26 May 1992 Match Drawn Lord's Middlesex Bat 188 & 227-9 486-7d
10-13 Sep 1991 Lost By 60 Runs Lord's Middlesex Bat 235 & 116 224 & 187
20-22 Aug 1991 Match Drawn The Oval Surrey Bat 341-9d & 208 297 &101-2
12-15 Sep 1990 Match Drawn The Oval Surrey Bat 480-9d & 373 425-8d & 102-2
23-25 May 1990 Match Drawn Lord's Middlesex Bat 286-7d & 0-0 310 & 224

GO TO:




BACK TO: